Errata
Here is the errata list for Data Structures and Algorithm
Analysis in C++ (2/e), by Mark Allen Weiss. Some of the errors affect the
source code; updates to the code are done automatically. Click here
to report a new error.
Second printing
DATE PAGE WHO PROBLEM
-------- --- --- ----------------------------------------------------------
08/04/99 018 TA Paragraph 2, line 3, change "copied with ==" to "copied with =".
03/20/99 024 MAW End of second line of operator= subsection: change "that" to "the"
02/08/00 083 AH Figure 3.24: Literal needs to define operator!=
01/24/99 095 FSV (Clarification) The standard would suggest that the technique
described in paragraph 4 is legal, and that Borland 5.0 is wrong.
02/16/99 097 MAW Figure 3.45: remove "new" immediately after "throw"
02/16/99 102 MAW Figure 3.53: remove "new" immediately after "throw"
04/17/99 138 SH In the two-children case, the recursive call to
remove should have t->element as a parameter instead of x.
12/01/99 144 AS Change .328 to 1.328.
03/27/99 166 DH Line 24, item 5, change "L children" to L "data items"
04/06/99 167 DH Line 15, change "first level could " to "next level could"
02/19/99 172 DM In Exercise 4.10, mention that N is the number of nodes
11/13/99 185 WB Last sentence of next to last paragraph, change "would be
recognized." to ">> would be recognized as the token."
11/13/99 186 WB In Figure 5.7, since name is private, the hash function
should either be a friend or use a public accessor, such as
item.getName( );
04/17/99 287 KQ Remove "insertion" from caption in Figure 7.20.
09/11/99 551 MAW There is no accessor version of operator[] for map.
10/27/99 574 I&G operator>> and getline should not need to assume
a limit of MAX_LENGTH and a different version
is provided in the source code for another book
(Data Structures and Problem Solving Using C++, 2/e).
If we stick with this version, both routines have
a technical bug: if the read fails, we still
attempt to use buf, even though it is uninitialized.
An easy fix is to add this test to the code.
09/04/00 568/9 JW Microsoft seems to have a bug that delete[] on
a zero-length array crashes if the arrays contains
objects with virtual destructors.
First printing
DATE PAGE WHO PROBLEM
-------- --- --- ----------------------------------------------------------
12/09/98 025 MAW The description of the default initializer list for
a copy constructor that is provided is wrong. The
correct description is that the copy constructor
in Fig 1.13 has initializer lists that call the
zero parameter, rather than the copy constructors
of the data members.
11/11/98 026 MAW In Figure 1.14, remove the semicolons at the end of the
declarations for read and write
12/09/98 185 MAW In Fig 5.6, need to add initialization of theLists
to the initializer list. See the online code.
12/09/98 193 MAW In Fig 5.14, need to add initialization of currentSize
and array to the initializer list. See the online code.
Credits
TA Thomas Anastasio
WB Wei Bai
DH Dennis Hamilton
SH Sharon Harvey
AH Alexander Hinds
I&G Ireneusz Lidwa and Greg Menke
DM Dylan McNamee
KQ Ke Qiu
AS Ari Stern
FSV Faisal Sabir Vali
JW Jeffrey Walton
Printing History
First Printing: November 1998
You can see which
printing you have by looking at the bottom of the copyright page for a sequence
of numbers. If you see 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
you have the first printing.